I was going to write this in the style of Mr Dyer but I can't bring myself to do it.
There has - quite rightly been an outcry about the Danny Dyer column in this week's Zoo in which he suggests that a guy would find it easier to get over his ex if he went out with his mates and smashed 'anything that moves' or cut his ex's face.
A lot of the anger has been directed at Danny Dyer himself. What people don't seem to realise is that he will have noting to do with this at all. In the slightest. Not even a little bit. This will have been written by someone junior who's job it is to channel TV's most risible east ender. All of the blame for the above lies with Zoo magazine - specifically the editors. The one responsible for this should be proper booted and given a real goin' ova fackin' sharpish.
Comments